A large property management company managing numerous property units in the UK was subject to a liability claim following a trip at one of their premises.
Situated in London and a multi-tenanted building comprising a mix of commercial, assured tenants and shared ownership units.
The property where the incident occurred had a rear and front entrance. The rear access was never intended for regular use, and our customer had advised, in writing, all inhabitants that they should refrain from using the gate to the rear of the property.
To alert visitors to the potential trip hazard, yellow and black warning tape is wrapped around the bottom bar and there are ‘caution -mind the step’ signs at eye-level on both sides of the gate.
Despite this, the gate continued to be used and on one particular occasion, a visitor to one of the business units caught his toe on the bar and fell, sustaining a fractured cheekbone requiring surgery.
Although the accident was not reported at the time, the visitor subsequently attempted to make a claim against the building managers for the injury incurred.
Full risk assessments on the premises were in place, carried out by independent health and safety consultants.
Although, these had not specified the trip hazard created by the gate, a subsequent visit by the consultant found that the area of the gate was well lit and that the hazard had already been highlighted with hazard tape before the accident.
He confirmed that these constituted reasonable measures.
On being advised that the person who suffered the injury intended to make a claim, we were able to offer a robust defence, citing the evidence supplied by our customer. We denied liability, setting out all of the relevant facts and no further action was instigated by the claimant.
"With this in mind, we stress to all of our customers how vital it is to have carried out fully-documented risk assessments which, in the event of a possibly spurious public liability claim, will be the main form of defence."